The Incident Command System: A Proven Tool
For The Management Of Emergency Operations
By: Ernest G. Vendrell, CPP, CPO, CEM
June 2001
Reprint Protection News
Introduction
Each year emergencies and disasters take
their toll on government and industry. The devastating effects
of these critical events in terms of lives lost, injuries,
property damage, and lost business can have serious consequences
for organizations and communities.
However, government and industry can limit
the effects of emergencies and disasters, and be in a better
position to resume normal operations, by planning ahead.
This can be accomplished by developing a comprehensive emergency
response plan that provides the necessary structure for
managing critical incidents. Besides helping to save lives
and reduce property loss, a well thought out emergency response
plan can serve to lessen an organizations potential
liability.
Incident Command System
Clearly, the need to effectively communicate
and manage resources during a crisis situation is of vital
importance to any organization. Someone must be in charge
and priorities must be established. Direction and control
is essential in order to avoid conflict and confusion and
establish order out of chaos.
Fortunately, there exists a recognized
system with a predetermined chain-of-command, as well as
a proven structure, for an organized response to a critical
incident. Referred to as the Incident Command System (ICS),
it uses common terminology that is descriptive and decisive,
yet not difficult to understand, in order to control personnel,
resources, and communications at the scene of a critical
incident.
ICS was developed in the early 1970s
after a series of major wildland fires in Southern California
resulted in a number of recurring problems among emergency
responders. Some of these included: nonstandard terminology,
nonstandard and nonintegrated communications, unmanageable
span of control, and lack of the capability to expand and
contract as required by the situation.
Although originally a fire service control
system, ICS has since been adopted by a wide variety of
local, state, and national emergency management and law
enforcement organizations due to its many documented successes.
Today, it serves as a model all-risk, all-agency emergency
management system. ICS principles have been proven over
time in government, business, and industry. In fact, ICS
has been endorsed by the International Chiefs of Police
(IACP) and the American Public Works Association (APWA).
There is also a legal requirement for using
ICS since there are federal laws that mandate its use by
individuals responding to hazardous materials incidents.
Specifically, OSHA rule 1910.120, which became effective
March 6, 1990, requires that all organizations that handle
hazardous materials use ICS. Non-OSHA states are also required
by the Environmental Protection Agency to use ICS when responding
to hazardous materials incidents.
In essence, ICS is a well organized team
approach for managing critical incidents. It uses common
terminology, has a modular organization (which means that
it can expand/shrink according to the needs of the situation),
has a manageable span of control (the number of subordinates
one supervisor can manage effectively; usually 3-7, the
optimum is 5), and uses clear reporting and documentation
procedures. In effect, emergency response personnel can
view ICS as an incident management toolbox. Not every tool
in the toolbox will be used for every situation, but the
tools are available should they become necessary. Additionally,
it is important to note that ICS can be used for all types
of incidents regardless of size. However, it is essential
that all emergency responders understand their specific
roles when using ICS.
The ICS structure is built around 5 major
management activities or functional areas5:
COMMAND - Sets priorities and
objectives and is responsible for overall command of the
incident.
OPERATIONS - Has responsibility
for all tactical operations necessary to carry out the
plan.
PLANNING - Responsible for the
collection, evaluation, and dissemination of information
concerning incident development as well as the status
of all available resources.
LOGISTICS - Responsible for providing
the necessary support (facilities, services, and materials)
to meet incident needs.
FINANCE - Responsible for monitoring
and documenting all costs. Provides the necessary financial
support related to the incident.

Figure 1. Basic Incident Command
System organizational structure.
These five management activities or functional
areas form the foundation of the ICS organizational structure.
The activities can be managed by one individual in the event
of a small incident. Or a fully staffed ICS structure, addressing
all five functional areas, may be needed to manage larger
or more complex events. In both cases, it is important to
note that the Incident Commander is the individual in charge
at the scene of a critical incident until properly relieved.
The Incident Commander is also responsible for assigning
personnel to the other functional areas (Operations, Planning,
Logistics, and Finance) as needed.
Conclusion
ICS organizational structure and procedures
enable emergency response personnel to work safely together
to take control of a critical incident. It can also assist
organizations to effectively and efficiently manage the
aftermath of a critical incident.
To learn more about ICS, contact your local
or state office of emergency management. These offices usually
make training available to government and industry.
Endnotes
- L. Dezelan, Incident Management System. Law
and Order, vol. 44, No. 8.; B. Woodworth, The Incident
Command System: A Tool for Business Recovery. Disaster
Resource Guide, 1998 Edition.
- Federal Emergency Management Agency, Incident Command
System Instructor Guide (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1995).
- Ibid.
- Woodworth, supra note 1; M. Arata, Jr., Finding
Order Amidst the Chaos. Security Management, vol.
39, No. 9, pp. 48-53; Ibid.
- Federal Emergency Management Agency, supra note 2.
|